do you own this site? its been plastered about a bit today

nothing on the vt though, usually a thread on weekend scores every week

what a shocking game tonight, not only the two teams playing but childs sin-binning flynn!

if wakey hold onto win, agar owes childs a pint!

Why number 6?

if Flynn had held him down it would have been a sin binning, surely a high tackle to stop the breakaway should also be a yellow? Otherwise players would just high shot to stop those!

So where was the high tackle?

If it was a sin bin for a high tackle, where the was it? James Childs you have ruined a close match you absolute .

It was definitely a high tackle, that's not in doubt, the sin binning was strange though. The sinbinning in the Bradford game was spot on, this was just weird, it's as though Child got carried away with it being a break.

After seeing the replay I wonder which part of him was hit high. Looked like a grab of the shoulders with minimal, if any, contact with the head

It wasn't in any way shape or form a high tackle.

Yes it was. His arm comes over the Wakefield players shoulder and hits his head, then carrying on over the top of his head.

It doesn't. It wasn't a high tackle and even if it was (it wasn't) an actual classic high tackle from a Wakefield player went without a bin later on.

It was a chickensh*t decision from a stupid referee and it cost us any hope of winning. Rather tellingly Wakefields last try was down Flynn's emptied wing.

It was a marginal penalty at best, to put him in the bin for it was nothing short of absurd, even for a referee as utterly incompetent as James Child.

Yes it does, im watching it on replay now and the arm quite clearly hits the Wakey players shoulder and carries on to hit his head then up and over his head.
I'd agree the binning was daft, still doesn't mean it's not a high tackle.