As far as I can see, NOTHING at least on the plus side; he has put nothing in, not even a pledge, but has been a catalyst in enabling (probably) vultures to take our assets(young players) away. Shame on you Mr Caisley.

So you think Peter Hood should have been allowed to continue doing what he was doing?

Second post on thread changes subject!

But the answer is, he has achieved administration.

Lets hope he has a plan to keep us in super league otherwise he has wasted his time. Lets hope he values his time more than this and isnt one for wasting time

Mike, you have repeatedly asked on here, over recent weeks, for people to explain to you what was going on and what some of the things that were happening really meant or entailed.

That does suggest to me that you maybe are not quite as well-placed as you would wish to be able to form an objective view?

Yeah and Im entitled to my opinion just as much as anybody else.

For a champion of objectivity, your pious condescending nature of that particular post is poor form.

Where was the money needed going to come from to stave off the winding up order & administrators without Caisley getting involved?

The most shameful thing in this whole sorry saga is Hood collecting peoples pledges knowing he was about the clear off, of his own will or not.

Whilst not arguing Hood's case it could be said that he may have believed Caisley had backers lined up in which case had he not collected the pledges the club would have folded. He bough Caislt time to put his plan into operation. Only Caisly knows what his true objective was.

If Hood did have a viable and realistic plan post pledge then he could have got on with it, Caisley et al would have looked a bit daft voting him out at an EGM if he had a survival plan in place.

So we over psnet and made £1.2million debts in the 2month Caisley was there?

No.

Who would invest in a house one party had told the world was bitterly divided, once that became clear?