We would have won. Several of their tries came from obstructions and knock ons and would have gone to the screen. It once again highlights poor refereeing standards and inconsistancies. What about when Goulding was out cold?? I thought if a player had a head injury play had to stop...

but it wasnt.

From memory their first try looked dubious but I was at the other end which gave me a perfect view of their last try which was an embarrassment. The 12 year old in goal judge lost the plot but then who's putting lads like those in these positions anyway?

Even with those decisions and the players we rested we still only have ourselves to blame.

precious!

Correct.

Just saying the same myself.

Certainly one of their first half tries would have been ruled out had the VR been used at that game for an obstruction, Briscoe's "knock on" in the build up to another would have been worth a look too. I'm not sure on the ruling regarding Goulding's situation but he was out cold.

End of the day though, the referees are not going to be blamed for seriously underestimating the opposition.

Had you not shown chronic disrespect you would have won. That's an awful excuse and you should be looking at the real reason you lost today.

Agreed. Wigan's defeat (apparently they lost, I was shocked when I checked on the BBC) was due to the referee, not from the fact they picked seventeen random lads off King Street last night and played them.

I'm sorry but televised or not we missed to many 1 on 1 tackles, dropped to much ball and widnes didn't their completion rate was good today and they deserved the win. We shouldn't be conceding 37 points against anyone never mind widness

Listening to it on the radio it seemed a few calls went Wigans way....but I can't really comment, I wasn't there

P.S He is a shocking ref though tbh, it is embarassing todays reffing performances.